Thursday, February 12, 2009
Bang for buck? #2?!!!
Not really. lol.
This blog is about the best value for the price, and im telling you right now, this isn't taking anything. But its the cobalt's closest competition. So here it is.
$23,000, 200hp, standard serius radio, 0-60 mph in 6.2, 28 mpg highway....WAIT WHAT?????
slower and less fuel effiecient then the cobalt, and more expensive???????
might as well forget about this car.
Remember this blog is to find out the one car, that gives you the most bang for your buck. not to review every car i choose.
=)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The GTI doesn't have the tendency to understeer like the Cobalt does, and the interior Luxuries whoop the cobalt any day of the year. It is more reliable, it depreciates much slower then the Cobalt does, It has more dependability, and if driven properly on a track It would utterly obliterate the cobalt. You forget this car on a manual transmission on a track can beat a WRX, If you buy it with the DSG Gear box then, this car is so out of proportion with the Cobalt they shouldn't even be the same category =\
ReplyDeleteactually the cobalt ss would destroy the gti on the track any day of the weak. Must more powerful engine, meaning faster speeds and acceleration, better tires, stiffer suspension. List goes on.
ReplyDeleteyou can't compare them on the track. The cobalt has a turbochared 260 hp engine, the gti barely hits 200 hp.